Very cool review, thanks for sharing! I respectfully disagree with his opinion on "The Hounds of Baskerville," though. While lacking Jim's fingers in the pie, it served the most excellent purpose of showcasing Sherlock's and Watson's friendship, as well as Sherlock's own vulnerability, which opens him up for the events of the next episode -- we see him as vulnerable, there's a chink in his brainiac armor that Jim can squeeze through and exploit. The consulting criminal knew it was there, but we didn't, and "Hounds" was a great way to show us.
But I'm definitely going to go see what else this dude has to say. :-)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2012-06-19 11:14 am (UTC)But I'm definitely going to go see what else this dude has to say. :-)